I was leafing through some old editions of Wireless World magazine this week and came across an article in the July, 1968 issue called “Computing Distortion: Method for low-power transistor amplifiers” by L. B. Arguimbau and D.M. Fanger.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I was immediately intrigued by the first sentence, which read:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Unlike those of thermionic valves, the non-linearities in junction transistors for low collector currents are highly uniform and predictable, hardly differing from one transistor to another.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Now, as an “audio professional”, I’m very used to seeing the “\u00b1” sign in data sheets. Any production line of anything has some tolerance limits within which the product will fall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For example, the (on-axis, where applicable) magnitude response of a loudspeaker or headphone is typically spec’ed something like \u00b1 3 dB within some frequency range. This would mean that, at some frequency within that range, when measured under identical conditions, two “identical” products (e.g. with the same brand and model name) might be as much as 6 dB apart.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For different devices and components inside those devices, the tolerance values are different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is why, for example, when I read that someone says “headphone model A has more bass than headphone model B”, I know that if you included the missing information, it would actually read “my sample of<\/em> headphone model A has more bass than my sample of<\/em> headphone model B”.<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, when it comes down to the component level, I’m used to seeing tighter tolerances. Of course, if you save money on resistors, they might be within 20% of the stated value. However, if I look at the specs of a decent DAC (which, in my case, is a chip that would be used inside a product – not a big DAC-in-a-box that sits on your desk), I’m used to seeing numbers like < \u00b11 dB within pragmatically usable frequency ranges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Since I’m only a young person, I’ve only really worked with transistor-based equipment, both when I worked in studios and also since I started working in home audio. So, I’ve always taken it for granted, and never even considered that the distortion characteristics of a transistor would vary from one to another. This is because, as the article from 1968 states: they don’t… much…<\/p>\n\n\n\n However, I’ve never thought about the (now obvious) possibility that two “identical” tubes\/valves will have different distortion behaviour, even at low levels, due to manufacturing differences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So, the next time someone tells you that this tube amp is better than that tube amp (which I translate in my head to actually mean “I prefer the sound of this tube amp over the sound of that tube amp” since “better” is multi-dimensional with different weightings of the different dimensions by person), remind them that the full sentence should be:<\/p>\n\n\n\n “I prefer My sample<\/em> of this tube amp with the tubes that are currently in it<\/em> to that tube amp with the tubes that are currently in it<\/em>.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I was leafing through some old editions of Wireless World magazine this week and came across an article in the July, 1968 issue called “Computing Distortion: Method for low-power transistor amplifiers” by L. B. Arguimbau and D.M. Fanger. I was immediately intrigued by the first sentence, which read: Unlike those of thermionic valves, the non-linearities […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[66,4,65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7733","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-analogue","category-audio","category-measurements"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p48hIM-20J","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7733","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7733"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7733\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7734,"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7733\/revisions\/7734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7733"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7733"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.tonmeister.ca\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7733"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}